Re: irb problem

From: Phil (ciscostudent1@yahoo.com.br)
Date: Sun Feb 02 2003 - 12:30:09 GMT-3

• Next message: Matthew Poole: "ISDN assumptions."
• Previous message: Tony Schaffran: "RE: irb problem"
• Maybe in reply to: chen yi: "irb problem"
• Next in thread: Muyeenp@aol.com: "Re: irb problem"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Try adding the command "bridge 1 route ip" under bridge irb.
Phil
 
 chen yi <chenyinet@hotmail.com> wrote:e1----------r1---------r2---------e2

all interface in bridge group 1,but the bvi interface can not ping each
other,why?

r1 config:
int e1
bridge-group 1
int s0
bridge-group 1
int bvi 1
ip add 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0
bridge irb
bridge 1 protocol ieee

r2:
int e2
bridge-group 1
int s0
bridge-group 1
int bvi 1
ip add 172.16.1.2 255.255.255.0
bridge irb
bridge 1 protocol ieee

• Next message: Matthew Poole: "ISDN assumptions."
• Previous message: Tony Schaffran: "RE: irb problem"
• Maybe in reply to: chen yi: "irb problem"
• Next in thread: Muyeenp@aol.com: "Re: irb problem"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:01 GMT-3