From: Joe Chang (changjoe@earthlink.net)
Date: Tue Feb 04 2003 - 12:30:59 GMT-3
For my own lab attempts I didn't follow such an approach. In programming,
over-designing something can lead to unforseen side-effects. I think this
applies to configuring routers as well.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Poole" <matthew.poole@blueyonder.co.uk>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 10:27 AM
Subject: OSPF stub areas
> More assumptions!
>
> Should I assume that OSPF areas should be configured as stubs if eligible
to
> be so, although the lab doesn't specifically request it?
>
> I've just completed a lab and in the solution they did this - why not take
it
> one step further and make it totally stubby?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mat.
> .
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:07 GMT-3