Re: 3550 Vs. 2948G-L3

From: Erick B. (erickbe@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Feb 07 2003 - 02:18:56 GMT-3

• Next message: Peng Zheng: "Re: 3550 Layer 3"
• Previous message: Erick B.: "RE: Trunk on 10mb"
• Maybe in reply to: Mohammed Al-zubi: "3550 Vs. 2948G-L3"
• Next in thread: Phil: "Re: 3550 Vs. 2948G-L3"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

The 2948G-L3 feels like a router w/48 ethernet ports.
no switchport commands, no vlan interfaces/SVIs, etc.
subinterfaces for encapsulation dot1q/isl, etc.

If you want a VLAN then you put multiple ethernet
ports into same bridge-group and can configure IRB to
route between them like on a original router.

HTH, Erick

--- Mohammed Al-zubi <mohammed@sulafsolutions.com>
wrote:
> I just obtained a 2948G-L3 and I'm note sure if it
> has the same command
> base/functionality as the 3550, can someone shed the
> light on this issue.
>
> thanks list,
> Mohammed
>
> <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
> Mohammed Al-Zubi
> VP Professional Services
> 24 Werner Ave. #21
> Daly City, CA 94014
> Tel: (650) 438-6384
> Fax: (720) 293-4897
> Web: <http://www.sulafsolutions.com/>
> .
>

• Next message: Peng Zheng: "Re: 3550 Layer 3"
• Previous message: Erick B.: "RE: Trunk on 10mb"
• Maybe in reply to: Mohammed Al-zubi: "3550 Vs. 2948G-L3"
• Next in thread: Phil: "Re: 3550 Vs. 2948G-L3"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:15 GMT-3