From: Larry Letterman (lletterm@cisco.com)
Date: Mon Feb 17 2003 - 17:15:35 GMT-3
I'll bring it to the attention of the BU that handles the
switching products...
Larry Letterman
Network Engineer
Cisco Systems
----- Original Message -----
From: "Walker, Todd" <todd.walker@seurat.com>
To: "Mike Williams" <ccie2be@swbell.net>; "CCIE R&S Mailing
list" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 7:46 AM
Subject: RE: 3550 no NAT?
> At least is doesn't have "No plans" next to the 3550.
>
> Your quote below means that _other routers_ focus on NAT,
etc. Not the 3550's.
>
> Doesn't look good. Can anyone get a product team member
to comment on the 3550 road map for NAT?
>
> tw
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Williams [mailto:ccie2be@swbell.net]
> Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 9:29 PM
> To: 'CCIE R&S Mailing list'
> Subject: RE: 3550 no NAT?
>
>
> Here's the link to the matrix:
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_tec
h_note09186a
> 008011c629.shtml
>
> Here's a link to another document saying it DOES support
NAT:
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps646/produc
ts_configura
> tion_guide_chapter09186a008007f3b0.html
>
> "With the Catalyst 3550 multilayer switches providing
inter-VLAN routing
> and other network services, the routers focus on firewall
services,
> Network Address Translation (NAT) services, voice-over-IP
(VoIP) gateway
> services, and WAN and Internet access."
>
> Here is a document showing the 'debug cluster' command
that has a NAT
> keyword for the debugging of NAT messages:
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps646/produc
ts_command_r
> eference_chapter09186a008007d836.html#xtocid163252
>
> HTH,
> Mike W.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]
On Behalf Of
> Alex Hsieh
> Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 7:29 PM
> To: Mike Williams
> Cc: CCIE R&S Mailing list
> Subject: Re: 3550 no NAT?
>
>
> hi Mike:
>
> Could you please show me the link to matrix?Thanks.
>
> regards
> Alex
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Williams" <ccie2be@swbell.net>
> To: "'Amlendu Kumar'" <amlendu_kumar@hotmail.com>; "'Kip
Palmer'"
> <kip.palmer@verizon.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 7:26 AM
> Subject: RE: 3550 no NAT?
>
>
> > I found documentation on Cisco's website showing debug
commands to
> > debug NAT transactions on a 3550 as well as another
document saying
> > the 3550 can perform NAT. Having said that, I also
found a matrix
> > showing which Catalysts support NAT, and it said 3550
doesn't support
> > it. What's the deal?
> >
> > Mike W.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
[mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> > Of Amlendu Kumar
> > Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 2:21 PM
> > To: Kip Palmer; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: 3550 no NAT?
> >
> >
> > 3550 do not do nat and isis today
> >
> > Regards
> > Amlendu
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Kip Palmer" <kip.palmer@verizon.net>
> > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 6:21 PM
> > Subject: 3550 no NAT?
> >
> >
> > > -Back me up on this; The 3550 EMI does NOT do NAT.
> > >
> > > ==That's a question==
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance,
> > >
> > > Kip Palmer
> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:25 GMT-3