RE: FRTS: Bc & minCIR - interesting thoughts...

From: Sage Vadi (sagevadi@yahoo.co.uk)
Date: Sun Feb 23 2003 - 01:07:04 GMT-3

• Next message: ccie candidate: "2500 console problem"
• Previous message: Daniel Cisco Group Study: "RE: FRTS: Bc & minCIR"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Ohio,

Thanks! Okay can you help me clarify a few stray
thought-stragglers crawling in the back of mind
somewhere... =)

1. Bc is just a basic representation of CIR per Tc
interval.

Agree/Disagree?

2. Cisco CIR is generally configured to be
AR/port-speed.

Agree/Disagree?

3. Bc is a represetation of Cisco CIR NOT minCIR

Agree/Disagree? (per Tc obviously)

4. Be occurs @ the initial/start Tc because we have a
Bc that can go to our CIR which will be faster than
our minCIR - hence no real need for a Be per Tc

Agree/Disagree?

Thanks all!

I think I'm finally understanding FRTS, wohooo! Time
for celebration...

• Next message: ccie candidate: "2500 console problem"
• Previous message: Daniel Cisco Group Study: "RE: FRTS: Bc & minCIR"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:29 GMT-3