From: Fadil (fadiltakipte@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Mar 03 2003 - 21:26:13 GMT-3
Hi,
Thank you very much for your help.The link is really helpful. Can I ask you
something more?
For example I configure an Aironet to work on channel 11. I want to know the
frequency on which the clients are operating.. As far as I know , the
frequency for channel 11 is 2462 MHz. If they work on the same frequency
what kind of multiplexing do they use ? Can you explain this to me or
direct me to a useful link about this.
Thanks
Fadil
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pratt, Jeremy" <JPratt@coh.org>
To: "'Fadil'" <fadiltakipte@hotmail.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 1:40 PM
Subject: RE: Cisco Aironet
> Here's the link showing the max recommendation is 25 per A/P.
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/application/pdf/en/us/guest/netsol/ns178/c649/ccmigrati
> on_09186a00800d67eb.pdf
>
> Go to the bottom of page 31.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pratt, Jeremy
> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 1:36 PM
> To: 'Fadil'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: Cisco Aironet
>
>
> My wireless is setup for a max associations of 25 per A/P. This is based
> on
> my SE's recommendation and makes sense to me based on the 11 mbps max
> bandwidth.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Williams [mailto:ccie2be@swbell.net]
> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 11:34 PM
> To: 'Fadil'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: Cisco Aironet
>
>
> IIRC, Cisco's 1200s can handle up to 255 (I know it's between 250-255).
> However, since all users associated with a single AP are effectively
> sharing bandwidth, etc, that would be like having 250+ people sharing a
> single 10Mbps hub! That's ugly. I would highly recommend using more
> APs, preferrably enough that you have no more than 100 users per AP.
> Probably not what you want to hear, but there is NO WAY I'd support an
> AP with 500 people using it (I'd hate to be working in a place where
> 500+ people were within reach of a single AP =)
>
> Having said that, if you setup 3 APs each on their own frequency (1, 6,
> 11), then that would at least spread the burden around so that (in
> theory if they split evenly) you'd get 500/3 or ~167 users per AP. I
> would get more APs, spread them out, and even tweak the power of each AP
> so that I could have less than 100 people per AP (personally, I wouldn't
> want more than 50+ people on a single AP at any given time, but that's
> me)
>
> Mike W.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Fadil
> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 11:27 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Cisco Aironet
>
>
> Hi Group,
>
> Sorry for the off topic question.
> How many users can an aironet access point support ?For example if I
> have 500 users and all in one location how many aironets do I have to
> use (All in different channels but at the same location)?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Fadil
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
---- > This message and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the > individual or entity they are addressed. This communication may contain > information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure > under applicable law. If the reader of this communication is not the > intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering > the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any > dissemination, distribution or copying of the communication is strictly > prohibited. If you received the communication in error, please notify > us immediately by replying to this message and then deleting the message > and any accompanying files from your system. CONFIDENTIAL > ============================================================================ ==
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 08:51:31 GMT-3