From: CCIE FUN (ccieexam2002@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Mar 13 2003 - 13:09:14 GMT-3
i think the requirements are not to use backup peers.
--- Tasuka Amano Hsu <tasuka@mac.com> wrote:
> Hi, why don't you use the dlsw backup peer ?
>
> R1
> dlsw local-peer peer-id 10.1.1.1
> dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 10.1.1.2
> dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 10.1.1.3 backup-peer 10.1.1.2
>
>
> Best Regards
> Tasuka
>
> On Sunday, Feb 16, 2003, at 19:07 Asia/Taipei, Ali
> Fahmi wrote:
>
> > Hi All, I have topology like this,
> >
> R2----|
> > (VlanA)-R1 -------- F/R claud ------|
> |(VLanB)
> > R3
> ---|
> >
> >
> >
> > Configure dlsw on R1, R2 and R3, VLAN A can
> comunicate to VLAN B, R1
> > should prefer R2, dont use cost or backup peer,
> > Does dlsw redundancy is a best mothode to achieve
> this requirement ?
> >
> > Is config below right ?
> >
> > R1
> > dlsw local-peer peer-id 10.1.1.1
> > dlsw bridge-group 1
> > dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 10.1.1.2
> > dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 10.1.1.3
> >
> > bridge 1 protocol ieee
> >
> > interface E0
> > bridge-group 1
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > R2
> > dlsw local-peer peer-id 10.1.1.2 prom
> >
> > interface E0
> > dlsw transparent redundancy-enable 9999.9999.9999
> master-priority 10
> >
> >
> > R3
> > dlsw local-peer peer-id 10.1.1.3 prom
> >
> > interface E0
> > dlsw transparent redundancy-enable 9999.9999.9999
> >
> >
> >
> > thanks
> >
> >
>
=======================================================================
>
> > ====================
> > Meriahkan Hari Kasih Sayang dengan mengirimkan
> Kartu Elektronik
> > PlasaCom kepada kerabat dan teman yang Anda kasihi
> !
> > Pilih kartu favorit Anda di Polling Lomba Desain
> Kartu Tema Valentine
> > di http://kartu.plasa.com/lomba/
> >
>
=======================================================================
>
> > ====================
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 08:51:39 GMT-3