Re: Clarification on DISTANCE command

From: ccie2be (ccie2be@nyc.rr.com)
Date: Mon Mar 31 2003 - 11:22:04 GMT-3


The examples in the link answered some questions but raised some others.
Specifically, it's unclear whether the distance command's affect is local
only or if it's set on one router other routers adopt the same distance
measures. Also, when they explain the example of the command, " distance 90
172.15.30.0 0.0.0.255", they say all "routers" rather than all "routes" on
subnet 172.15.30.0 0.0.0.255 Doesn't that seem strange?

jim
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nigel Taylor" <nigel_taylor@hotmail.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 3:00 AM
Subject: Re: Clarification on DISTANCE command

> Cebuano,
> Here's a link that pretty much explains the command and
it's
> use. Based on your post, I don't believe there will a difference, in
how
> the router will interpret the commands
>
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fipr
> rp_r/ind_r/1rfindp1.htm#1017503
> watch the line wrap..
>
> HTH
>
> Nigel
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "cebuano" <cebu2ccie@cox.net>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 11:11 PM
> Subject: Clarification on DISTANCE command
>
>
> > Hi group.
> > Can someone eloquently explain the practical difference between these
> > two?
> >
> > Example 1:
> > Router ospf 1
> > Net a.b.c.d
> > Distance 255
> > Distance 90 a.b.c.d w.x.y.z
> > Distance 120 e.f.g.h w.x.yz
> >
> > Example 2:
> > Router ospf 1
> > Net a.b.c.d
> > Distance 90 a.b.c.d w.x.y.z
> > Distance 120 e.f.g.h w.x.y.z
> > Distance 255
> >
> > TIA.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 08:51:47 GMT-3