From: Teck PhrEAk!! (phreakinphunk@hotmail.com)
Date: Sun Apr 20 2003 - 01:55:53 GMT-3
My thots.....i have always belived that u always have to be as specific as
possible.....i wud match ip address and NOT the interface as hmm.......in
certain cases the interface cud also have a secondary ip address........i
think its always better to be specific.....either way is correct...
cheers,
sumit.
ccie#11125
ccdp,ccnp,rhce,scsa,mcse,ibm e-biz pro.
>From: Barry Templeton <barryt28078@yahoo.com>
>Reply-To: Barry Templeton <barryt28078@yahoo.com>
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Redistribute Connected- Best Method
>Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 08:30:24 -0700 (PDT)
>
>When asked to redistribute connected I tend to use a
>route-map that matches on the interface. Most
>solutions seem to use a route map that matches an
>access-list that in turn matches the ip address of the
>interfaces. Is there a reason that one method would be
>preferred over the other?
>
>!
>router isis
> redistribute connected route-map C2ISIS
>!
>route-map C2ISIS permit 10
> match interface Loopback0
>!
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo
>http://search.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2003 - 13:35:58 GMT-3