RE: 2950 for the 2nd switch?

From: Walker, James, IS (JWALKER2@PARTNERS.ORG)
Date: Thu May 15 2003 - 09:30:28 GMT-3

• Next message: Jung, Jin: "RE: Converting Custom Queue to CBWFQ"
• Previous message: Phil Virnoche: "OT: PIX answering ARP for other IPs on segment"
• Maybe in reply to: Aldo: "2950 for the 2nd switch?"
• Next in thread: Tim Fletcher: "RE: 2950 for the 2nd switch?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Aldo,

2950 is a fixed configuration. 2924XL-EN has 2 expansion slots for fiber
module, etc.

2950 only does DOT1Q, where as 2924 does both DOT1Q and ISL trunking.
2950 will work in "Desirable" trunk mode, but 2924 won't.

Get the 2924 with a 2922 fiber module.

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Aldo [mailto:febro@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2003 2:59 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: 2950 for the 2nd switch?

Hi All,

I'm shopping for the 2nd switch. I'm thinking of using 2924-XL-EN.
However I saw 2950 switch around the same price.
For those who have played with these 2 switches, my question is:
Does 2950 have all the features that 2924-XL-EN has, and therefore good for
the 2nd switch?

Thanks in advance for your 0.02
Aldo

• Next message: Jung, Jin: "RE: Converting Custom Queue to CBWFQ"
• Previous message: Phil Virnoche: "OT: PIX answering ARP for other IPs on segment"
• Maybe in reply to: Aldo: "2950 for the 2nd switch?"
• Next in thread: Tim Fletcher: "RE: 2950 for the 2nd switch?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2003 - 15:13:43 GMT-3