From: Mike Williams (ccie2be@swbell.net)
Date: Fri May 16 2003 - 19:27:13 GMT-3
It seems you could still use multilink if you apply the encryption
settings to the Virtual Interface created by the multilink bundle (i.e.
Setup and use a virtual template for your PPP mulilink, and the T1s will
be combined into a single Virtual Interface) This should avoid the
mismatched passwords as there would only be one.
Mike W.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Jung, Jin
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2003 10:35 AM
To: 'Tim Fletcher'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Load balance 2 T1s using Tunnel..
If I do multilink,
Since packet can take either T1 to,
Crypto map password does not match for some packets and will have to
retransmitt. And will not work..
Jin jung...
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Fletcher [mailto:tim@fletchmail.net]
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2003 11:18 AM
To: Jung, Jin; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Load balance 2 T1s using Tunnel..
How about combining them into a multilink interface?
-Tim Fletcher #11406
At 08:31 AM 5/16/2003 -0400, Jung, Jin wrote:
>I am not sure this is possible, if any one have this setup , please let
>me know.
>
>I have 2 T1s with IPSEC,
>And Have 2 tunnels for each T1,
>
>Due to a IPSEC configuration, I am unable to load balance between these
>two links.
>-- crypto password mismatch-- can not do multilink,...
>
>I will like to load balance between them,
>And I was thinking, If I use tunnel interface with loopback address as
>source and dest. And crypto map of course.
>
>I may be able to load balance after all with single tunnel interface.
>
>
>R1 loop0 =============== R2 loop0
>
>Does anyone has experience with this kind of setup?
>
>Thanks....
>
>
>
>Jin Jung
>Enterprise Information Services
>Network Infrastructure engineer
>Office: 301-640-3247
>Have a great day
>l
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2003 - 15:13:44 GMT-3