4506 Sup4 instead of 3550

From: sustundag@tepum.com.tr
Date: Mon Jun 02 2003 - 06:34:07 GMT-3

• Next message: Emad: "strange behaviour"
• Previous message: Oliver Ziltener: "AW: 3550: Discard encapsulated tagged packet"
• Next in thread: Charles Church: "RE: 4506 Sup4 instead of 3550"
• Maybe reply: Charles Church: "RE: 4506 Sup4 instead of 3550"
• Maybe reply: Pratt, Jeremy: "RE: 4506 Sup4 instead of 3550"
• Maybe reply: Charles Church: "RE: 4506 Sup4 instead of 3550"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Group
I checked both device`s manual
Can i use 4506 instead of 3550
Thanks in advance

• Next message: Emad: "strange behaviour"
• Previous message: Oliver Ziltener: "AW: 3550: Discard encapsulated tagged packet"
• Next in thread: Charles Church: "RE: 4506 Sup4 instead of 3550"
• Maybe reply: Charles Church: "RE: 4506 Sup4 instead of 3550"
• Maybe reply: Pratt, Jeremy: "RE: 4506 Sup4 instead of 3550"
• Maybe reply: Charles Church: "RE: 4506 Sup4 instead of 3550"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jul 04 2003 - 11:10:51 GMT-3