From: badger (badger@pongo.org)
Date: Fri Jun 06 2003 - 15:51:02 GMT-3
Hello John,
Friday, June 6, 2003, 9:43:22 AM, you wrote:
BJ> This is off topic but....
BJ> Does anyone else find it unfair that government contractors with
BJ> positions that require security clearances won't hire you without one but
BJ> there is no way to obtain one without a current position with a government
BJ> contractor.....Nice catch-22
BJ> John B Bigelow CCIE #10565 MCSE
BJ> Network Analyst II
BJ> Enterprise Deployment
BJ> John.Bigelow@BCBSFL.com
BJ> x - 904-363-5401
BJ> NAS-161
BJ> Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., and its subsidiary and affiliate companies are not responsible for errors or omissions in this e-mail message. Any personal comments made in this e-mail
BJ> do not reflect the views of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc. The information contained in this document may be confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to
BJ> whom it is addressed. This document may contain material that is privileged or protected from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or the individual
BJ> responsible for delivering to the intended recipient, please (1) be advised that any use, dissemination, forwarding, or copying of this document IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED; and (2) notify sender
BJ> immediately by telephone and destroy the document. THANK YOU.
I believe that it is the contractor's prerogative. Security clearances
are expensive and the particular contract that you have in mind simply
doesn't want that expense...some contractors do pay for the clearance.
-- Best regards, badger mailto:badger@pongo.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jul 04 2003 - 11:10:54 GMT-3