From: wing_lam@jossynergy.com
Date: Thu Jun 12 2003 - 04:08:13 GMT-3
Hi, Danny,
I have ever do the same as you and I find that "redistribute ISIS" will not
includes connected routes which in the ISIS domain. I opened a case to
Cisco and they verify that it's true. They told me it comes out because
it's related to the "ip router isis" is configured in the interface but
rather than under "router XXX" which is the case in OSPF, EIGRP and RIP.
Finally they claims that this can only be solved by redistribute connect
instead, but maybe future IOS can support this.
BBD (Big Black Dog)
Danny.Andaluz@tri
aton-na.com To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent by: cc:
nobody@groupstudy Subject: ISIS redistributing connected into OSPF
.com
06/12/2003 12:57
PM
Please respond to
Danny.Andaluz
Hello, Group. If I redistribute ISIS on r2 into OSPF on r2, will the
connected network between r2 and r1 also be redistributed? I would expect
it to be since it has ip router isis configured on the interface. Does "IP
router isis" put the interface in the isis process? It doesn't seem like
it. It did not redistribute it and I had to add "red connected subnets"
under OSFP to get the network to r3.
r1 and r2 run isis.
r2 and r3 run ospf
r1-----r2-----r3
Thanks,
Danny
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jul 04 2003 - 11:10:57 GMT-3