From: Larry Letterman (lletterm@cisco.com)
Date: Thu Jun 19 2003 - 17:25:20 GMT-3
Same here..svi interfaces work great in the EMI code, then /30 links to
My gateway pairs. STP is kept to the local subnet only..
Larry Letterman
Cisco Systems
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Pratt, Jeremy
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 1:20 PM
To: 'Larry Letterman'; 'Emad '; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: CAT3550: SMI and EMI version
You're right, SMI is a basic layer 2 switch, EMI is a switch/router.
I use my 3550's with EMI to terminate a vlan group that resides only on
that switch. I then use L3 uplinks to the distribution 4507's. This way
there are absolutely no spanning tree issues that arise and affect the
infrastructure.
-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Letterman [mailto:lletterm@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 1:12 PM
To: 'Emad '; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: CAT3550: SMI and EMI version
The routing commands in the smi are either not supported or don't
exist.. I believe that's the main difference..however I will be
corrected I am sure :)
Larry Letterman
Cisco Systems
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Emad
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 12:50 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: CAT3550: SMI and EMI version
Folks,
I know how to distinguish between the SMI and the Emi versions from the
flash file itself , but what is the difference in commands and features
between both? thanx
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jul 04 2003 - 11:11:01 GMT-3