RE: BGP network statement

From: Phuong (kieu@hn.vnn.vn)
Date: Sat Jul 05 2003 - 19:21:00 GMT-3


I think you sould use Peer Group for this situation, 10 eBGP peers will
be placed in a group which have the same policies. Individual eBGP peer
can have its own police that have higher precedence than group policy.
This is yours
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/
fipr_c/ipcprt2/1cfbgp.htm#1002048

With route-map you can do many thing even distribute-list and
filter-list could be replaced by route-map, other purposes are set
LOCAL_PREF, MED, Weight, prepending AS_Path ..ect ..

Hope that I haven't made any mistake ;-)
Phuong

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
John Humphrey
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 11:39 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: BGP network statement

yesterday I posted the following question:

I have a quick BGP question.

If R1 has 150.1.0.0/16 in its bgp table, is there a way to advertise
this
route to ONLY ONE eBGP peer. I know you can use distribute-list to deny
and allow certain routes, but if you have 10 eBGP peers (hypothetical
situation) and you I wanted to send this route to R2 only, do I need to
specifically deny that route via an access-list (or prefix-list) all the
other nine peers? Seems like there must be an easier way.

I got back some very good results but it brought up another question. I
noticed that bgp "network" statements have a "route-map" option
and "backdoor" option. I know what "backdoor" is used for, but what kind
of information can be set with the route-map option. Can I use it to
solve the question I posted yesterday (only advertise the route to
specific bgp peers)?

jh



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:25 GMT-3