From: Brian Dennis (brian@labforge.com)
Date: Wed Jul 09 2003 - 13:44:38 GMT-3
It still happens in 12.3. The solution is of course to add the
interfaces that are running RIP to the route-map that is used for the
redistribution of the connected routes.
Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Badger
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 9:14 AM
To: Ram Shummoogum
Cc: park@wams.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Gotcha on Redistribute Connected
I posted a similar problem "Subject OSPF <-> EIGRP redistribution."
I'm
experiencing this not only with rip/ospf, but also ospf/eigrp. I have
found a
cause/reason/solution yet. I use 12.1.5(14)T and plan to just flash
12.2x to
see if it fixes the rpoblem.
Quoting Ram Shummoogum <rshummoo@ca.ibm.com>:
> I don't think you are tripping. I have been observing this too in few
> ipexpert labs and I always keep any eye on this.
>
> RAM
>
>
> Jeongwoo Park <jpark@wams.com>@groupstudy.com on 07/09/2003 11:28:26
AM
>
> Please respond to Jeongwoo Park <jpark@wams.com>
>
> Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
>
>
> To: lab <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> cc:
> Subject: Gotcha on Redistribute Connected
>
>
> Hi, all
> Here is the layout where the "redistribute connected" got me.
>
> R1-----ospf------R2-lo 0
> |
> rip
> |
> R3
>
> What I did was that I redistributed the connected network (loopback
> network)
> into ospf with route-map only for the loopback network like this.
> router ospf 1
> router-id 2.2.2.2
> log-adjacency-changes
> summary-address 170.100.20.0 255.255.255.0
> redistribute connected subnets route-map c2o
> redistribute rip subnets
> network 170.100.124.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
> !
> route-map c2o permit 10
> match ip address 1
> !
> access-list 1 permit 170.100.20.0 0.0.0.7
>
> Now, I redistribute rip into ospf on R2.
>
> The problem is that R1 can't see the rip network.
>
> What I think is the gotcha is that when R2 redistribute "Connected"
with
> route-map, it filtered the rip network, because the rip network is the
> connected network as well from the R2's stand point.
>
> Am I saying right or I am tripping?
>
> Please let me know what I am doing wrong here.
>
> Thanks,
>
> JP
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:30 GMT-3