Alternative to passive-interface command?

From: jsogla@comcast.net
Date: Mon Jul 14 2003 - 12:49:21 GMT-3

• Next message: John Matijevic: "Re: Alternative to passive-interface command?"
• Previous message: jgraun@comcast.net: "THE END IS NEAR"
• Next in thread: John Matijevic: "Re: Alternative to passive-interface command?"
• Maybe reply: John Matijevic: "Re: Alternative to passive-interface command?"
• Maybe reply: Robert Laidlaw: "Re: Alternative to passive-interface command?"
• Maybe reply: Alvarez, Rolando [NCSUS]: "RE: Alternative to passive-interface command?"
• Maybe reply: John Matijevic: "Re: Alternative to passive-interface command?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hello all,

I am looking /trying to figure this out:

An alternative to using the passive-interface command is to use a more
restrictive dialer list that denies EIGRP packets?

Example:

Pod4R2(config)#dialer-list 1 protocol ip ?
  deny Deny specified protocol
  list Add access list to dialer list
  permit Permit specified protocol

Pod4R2(config)#dialer-list 1 protocol ip deny ?
  <cr>

Dialer-list 1 protocol ip ????????

This is in reference to:

DDR - CCIE Practical Studies Vol. 1

Chapter 7 Page 498 1st paragraph:

Thank you for all your help,

Jim S

• Next message: John Matijevic: "Re: Alternative to passive-interface command?"
• Previous message: jgraun@comcast.net: "THE END IS NEAR"
• Next in thread: John Matijevic: "Re: Alternative to passive-interface command?"
• Maybe reply: John Matijevic: "Re: Alternative to passive-interface command?"
• Maybe reply: Robert Laidlaw: "Re: Alternative to passive-interface command?"
• Maybe reply: Alvarez, Rolando [NCSUS]: "RE: Alternative to passive-interface command?"
• Maybe reply: John Matijevic: "Re: Alternative to passive-interface command?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:38 GMT-3