From: Brian McGahan (brian@cyscoexpert.com)
Date: Tue Jul 15 2003 - 21:00:02 GMT-3
You misunderstood what I said. I said that .3ad is the standard
for LACP, which is used for port aggregation. PAgP is the Cisco
proprietary solution for this. It's like .1q vs ISL. .1q is the
standard, while ISL is the Cisco proprietary solution.
HTH,
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
Director of Design and Implementation
brian@cyscoexpert.com
CyscoExpert Corporation
Internetwork Consulting & Training
Toll Free: 866-CyscoXP
Outside US: 847.674.3392
Fax: 847.674.2625
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boby2kusa@hotmail.com [mailto:boby2kusa@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 5:31 PM
> To: Brian McGahan; 'Jim Phillipo'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: 6509 to Foundry ServerIron Trunk
>
> Trunk vs channeling. Two different concepts. 802.1Q is a standard
for
> trunking while 802.3ad is the standard for port channel.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Brian McGahan" <brian@cyscoexpert.com>
> To: "'Jim Phillipo'" <jim.phillipo@guardent.com>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 11:24 AM
> Subject: RE: 6509 to Foundry ServerIron Trunk
>
>
> > Jim,
> >
> > I haven't worked with foundry before, but their documentation
> > says that they support 802.3ad. .3ad uses LACP (Link Aggregation
> > Control Protocol) to negotiate an "etherchannel". LACP is like PAgP
> > (Port Aggregation Protocol), but PAgP is Cisco proprietary. Think
of it
> > like ISL vs .1q. As long as a device supports LACP, a Cisco switch
can
> > channel with it.
> >
> >
http://www.foundrynet.com/services/documentation/sribcg/Trunking.html
> >
> >
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_configura
> > tion_guide_chapter09186a008007ec1c.html#23603
> >
> >
> > HTH
> >
> > Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
> > Director of Design and Implementation
> > brian@cyscoexpert.com
> >
> > CyscoExpert Corporation
> > Internetwork Consulting & Training
> > Toll Free: 866-CyscoXP
> > Outside US: 847.674.3392
> > Fax: 847.674.2625
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
Behalf
> > Of
> > > Jim Phillipo
> > > Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 2:47 PM
> > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: 6509 to Foundry ServerIron Trunk
> > >
> > > anyone know if it is possible to do Etherchannel/Trunk between a
> > Foundry
> > > and
> > > a Catalyst ?
> > >
> > > Jim Phillipo, CCNP, CCDP
> > > Sr. Internetworking Engineer
> > > W: 401.456.1821 F: 401.456.0599 M: 508.982.8923
> > > 90 Royal Little Drive, Providence, RI 02904
> > > www.guardent.com
> > > _____________________________________________________
> > > G U A R D E N T
> > > Security | Privacy | Data Protection
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:41 GMT-3