From: badger (badger@pongo.org)
Date: Sun Jul 20 2003 - 22:15:35 GMT-3
Hello Jonathan,
Sunday, July 20, 2003, 6:09:44 PM, you wrote:
JVH> I'm guessing the conversion factor is 8 bits/Byte:
JVH> 27 KiloBytes x 8 bits/Byte = 216 Kilobits
JVH> -----Original Message-----
JVH> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
JVH> badger
JVH> Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 3:07 PM
JVH> To: Connie Nie
JVH> Cc: Richard Boover; Jim Phillipo; ccielab@groupstudy.com;
JVH> 'brian@cyscoexpert.com'; 'Peter'
JVH> Subject: Re[4]: QOS CBWFQ to Custom Queuing (again)
JVH> Hello Connie,
JVH> Sunday, July 20, 2003, 7:50:12 AM, you wrote:
CN>> There was a thread about this before. One opinion is that the CBWFQ
CN>> bandwidth should (in telnet's example): 14.8%x256x75% ---because the
JVH> total
CN>> reservable bandwidth by default in CBWFQ is 75% of the bandwidth.
CN>> Connie
JVH> Still confused, 75% of the original 256k is 192K. So my question
JVH> still stands, where did the "8" come from ?
JVH> Sometimes I need pictures to help explain 8-)
CN>> Jim,
CN>> How did you get the "8" in your:
CN>> "convert Custom Queuing (KB) to CBWFQ (Kbps): 27KB x 8 = 216Kbps"
Thanks, now it makes sense...as usual, I didn't look at it long enough
to actually read it 8-( I may never pass the lab with these habits!
-- Best regards, badger mailto:badger@pongo.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:46 GMT-3