From: Rivalino YMT. (rivel131@cyberlib.itb.ac.id)
Date: Tue Jul 22 2003 - 00:08:43 GMT-3
Hi Glenn,
Both config seems have no difference for voice/udp packets.
But, second config does not allocate bandwidth for IP.
That's what I think.
Rivalino
On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Glenn Johnson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Functionally speaking, when trying to prioritize voice/udp on a given
> interface, is there a difference
> between config 1 and config 2 below?
> Thanks
>
> Config 1
> -----------
> Access-list 101 permit udp any any range 16384 16383
> Access-list 102 permit ip any any
> Class-map VOX
> Match access-group 101
> Class-map DEBRIS
> Match access-group 101
> Policy-map VOX_POL
> Class VOX
> Priority 64
> Class DEBRIS
> Bandwidth Percent 50
> Interface FA0/0
> Service-policy output VOX_POL
>
> Config 2
> ------------
> Interface FA0/0
> IP RTP Priority 16384 16383 64
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:48 GMT-3