Re: redistribution between ospf and rip2

From: ccie2be (ccie2be@nyc.rr.com)
Date: Tue Jul 22 2003 - 18:42:50 GMT-3


Actually. I don't think the issue has to due with metrics. If not
specified, OSPF automatically assigns a metric and your config shows a
metric being assigned to routes being redistributed into Rip. I don't why
it's ot working but I'm pretty sure it's not because of metrics. Raj

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonathan V Hays" <jhays@jtan.com>
To: "'Banlan Chen'" <banlan.chen@lycos.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 4:48 PM
Subject: RE: redistribution between ospf and rip2

> Try assigning default metrics.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Banlan Chen
> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 4:08 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: redistribution between ospf and rip2
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am tring to mutual redistribute ospf and rip2 with tag, but it doesn't
> work. from RIP side I can see the ospf routes, but at ospf side I can't
> see any routes from RIP. Could someone figure out what's problem in my
> configuration. Thanks a lot.
>
> interface Loopback0
> ip address 150.50.6.6 255.255.255.255
> !
> interface Ethernet0
> ip address 150.50.100.6 255.255.255.0
> !
> interface Serial0
> ip address 150.50.10.6 255.255.255.0
> encapsulation frame-relay
> ip ospf network point-to-point
> frame-relay map ip 150.50.10.2 421 broadcast
> frame-relay map ip 150.50.10.6 421
> frame-relay lmi-type ansi
> !
> router ospf 1
> log-adjacency-changes
> redistribute rip subnets route-map rip-os
> network 150.50.6.6 0.0.0.0 area 0
> network 150.50.10.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
> !
> router rip
> version 2
> redistribute ospf 1 metric 1 route-map os-rip
> passive-interface default
> no passive-interface Ethernet0
> network 150.50.0.0
> !
> route-map os-rip deny 10
> match tag 120
> !
> route-map os-rip permit 20
> set tag 110
> !
> route-map rip-os deny 10
> match tag 110
> !
> route-map rip-os permit 20
> set tag 120
> --
>
> --------- Original Message ---------
>
> DATE: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 19:19:11
> From: "Banlan Chen" <banlan.chen@lycos.com>
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Cc:
>
> >Hi Group,
> >
> >When I configure RIP over two FR main interfaces, I should enable
> split-horizon on each interface or just enable it at one of these
> interfaces.
> >Under ATM interface, Do I need configure ip split-horizon for RIP and
> EIGRP?
> >Thanks in advance.
> >
> >Banlan
> >
> >
> >____________________________________________________________
> >Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail!
> >http://login.mail.lycos.com/r/referral?aid=27005
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> >You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
> >
> >Subscription information may be found at:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail!
> http://login.mail.lycos.com/r/referral?aid=27005
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 06:52:49 GMT-3