From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Tue Aug 05 2003 - 12:00:05 GMT-3
There is a difference between "traceroute" (Unix and Cisco IOS systems)
and "tracert" (Microsoft systems).
Traceroute (as you originally mentioned) uses high udp ports
Tracert.exe uses icmp
HTH,
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
huang gang
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:16 AM
To: Scott Morris; 'Tom Young'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: could ping but couldn't traceroute
hi,scott:
i think i can not agree with you.i think tracert is also using icmp
echo.you can sniffer it using netxray or deb ip pac det on the router.
thx huangg
email: bgv@ggv.com.cn
Tel:   010-62984668-3912
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Scott Morris" <swm@emanon.com>
To: "'Tom Young'" <gitsyoung@yahoo.co.jp>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 9:56 PM
Subject: RE: could ping but couldn't traceroute
> Traceroute uses high port udp as the transport.  Ping uses ICMP.
> 
> Access list or firewall rules in between permitted one but not the 
> other.
> 
> Scott
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf 
> Of Tom Young
> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 5:28 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: could ping but couldn't traceroute
> 
> 
> Hi, group
> 
>     A very strange question,  for a global address, I
> could ping it, but couldn't traceroute it. WHY ?
>    I really confused.
> 
> Thanks alot
> 
> User Access Verification
> 
> Password:
> office01>en
> Password:
> office01#trace
> office01#traceroute 210.178.28.2
> 
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Tracing the route to 210.158.218.2
> 
>   1 202.248.86.129 0 msec 0 msec 4 msec
>   2 133.160.0.1 12 msec 8 msec 12 msec
>   3 133.160.239.34 8 msec 12 msec 8 msec
>   4 133.160.191.133 20 msec 20 msec 20 msec
>   5 133.160.224.51 24 msec 16 msec 12 msec
>   6 133.160.30.32 16 msec 20 msec 20 msec
>   7 133.160.240.254 16 msec 16 msec 16 msec
>   8 133.160.12.74 21 msec 16 msec 12 msec
>   9 210.171.224.49 12 msec 12 msec 12 msec
>  10 158.205.192.197 16 msec 12 msec 12 msec
>  11 158.205.192.150 16 msec 20 msec 16 msec
>  12 158.205.224.46 16 msec 16 msec 16 msec
>  13 158.205.235.69 16 msec 16 msec 16 msec
>  14 158.205.200.74 36 msec 36 msec 28 msec
>  15  *  *  *
>  16  *  *  *
>  17  *  *  *
>  18  *  *  *
>  19  *  *  *
>  20  *  *  *
>  21  *  *  *
>  22  *  *  *
>  23  *  *  *
>  24  *  *  *
>  25  *  *  *
>  26  *  *  *
>  27  *  *  *
>  28  *  *  *
>  29  *  *  *
>  30  *  *  *
> office01#ping 210.178.28.2
> 
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 210.158.218.2, timeout
> is 2 seconds:
> !!!!!
> Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max
> = 12/14/16 ms
> office01#
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! BB is Broadband by Yahoo!  http://bb.yahoo.co.jp/
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _
> You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
> 
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _
> You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
> 
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Sep 02 2003 - 18:53:53 GMT-3