From: John Matijevic (matijevi@bellsouth.net)
Date: Sun Aug 17 2003 - 22:45:12 GMT-3
Hello wwwjang,
Try testing without the passive interface command, you shouldn't need it
because EIGRP is a classless protocol, that will let you specify specific
network bits in your network statement, that would match the network. You
would still need the neighbor statement. Please post results.
Sincerely,
Matijevic
----- Original Message -----
From: <wwwjjang@chol.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2003 9:13 PM
Subject: Unicast update of EIGRP is possible??
> Hi..Everyone..
>
> i want to test a unicast update of EIGRP such as in the RIP.
> But It don't work well in my test..
> Who know the reason ???
>
> -------------
> Test Diagram
> --------------
>
> (1.1.1.1-e0)-R1-(S0 2.2.2.1)---(S0 2.2.2.2)-R2-(e0 3.3.3.1)
>
> ----------------
> My configuration
>
> => R1 want to send a unicast updates to R2
> so R1 don't send multicasts to R2 !!
> ----------------
> R1>
>
> router eigrp 100
> network 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255
> network 2.2.2.0 0.0.0.255
> passive-interface serial 0 **
> neighbor 2.2.2.2 serial 0 **
>
> R2>
> router eigrp 100
> network 3.3.3.0 0.0.0.255
> network 2.2.2.0 0.0.0.255
>
> => After this configuration,
> The eigrp neighbor relationship between R1 & R2 is not established.
> So, any EIGRP-updates is not transfered between R1 & R2 !!!
>
> => Unicast update of EIGRP is impossible ????
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Sep 02 2003 - 18:54:00 GMT-3