From: miken (miken@sisna.com)
Date: Wed Aug 27 2003 - 12:49:50 GMT-3
Based on the limited information the requirement gave, I would keep it
simple and configure it this way:
map-class frame-relay FRTS
frame-relay traffic-rate 8000 10000 **
no frame-relay adaptive-shaping
!
interface Serial0
ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
frame-relay class FRTS **
frame-relay traffic-shaping **
custom-queue-list 1 (The requirement was to put it on the Serial
Interface, not configure it for frame-relay) **
frame-relay map ip 1.1.1.2 201 broadcast
no frame-relay inverse-arp
frame-relay lmi-type ansi
frame-relay custom-queue-list 1 **
----- Original Message -----
From: <wwwjjang@chol.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 2:40 AM
Subject: Custom-Queueing in FRTS !!!
> Hi..Everyone..
>
> I'm trying to test a custom-queueing in FRTS.
> and i was confuesd by it..
>
> Is my solution right ???
>
> ---------
> Diagram
> ---------
>
> (e0 10.10.10.1)-R1--(s0 1.1.1.1)--FR--(s0 1.1.1.2)--R2-(e0 20.20.20.1)
>
> -The DLSW-peer connection is configured between R1's E0 & R2'E0
> (Encapsulation method is TCP)
>
> ----------
> Question
> ----------
> -On R1,Config a FRTS to have a CIR=8000bps,Burst size=10000bps
> -On R1's S0, DLSW traffic has a 50& BW,IP have a 25% BW,The remaining
> has a 25% BW.
>
> -------------
> My Solution
> -------------
> R1>
>
>
> interface Serial0
> ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
> encapsulation frame-relay
> frame-relay class FRTS **
> frame-relay traffic-shaping **
> frame-relay map ip 1.1.1.2 201 broadcast
> no frame-relay inverse-arp
> frame-relay lmi-type ansi
> !
> map-class frame-relay FRTS
> frame-relay cir 8000 **
> frame-relay bc 10000 **(Is it right??)
> no frame-relay adaptive-shaping
> frame-relay custom-queue-list 1 **
> !
> queue-list 1 protocol ip 1 list 190
> queue-list 1 protocol ip 2
> queue-list 1 default 3
> queue-list 1 queue 1 byte-count 7500
> queue-list 1 queue 2 byte-count 3750
> queue-list 1 queue 3 byte-count 3750
> !
> access-list 190 permit tcp any any eq 2065 **
>
> 1> => "access-list 190 permit tcp any eq 2065 any" is no need ???
> 2> Instead of "queue-list 1 protocol ip 1 list 190",
> How about the "queue-list 1 protocol ip 1 tcp 2065" ???
>
> Thanks...
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Sep 02 2003 - 18:54:07 GMT-3