From: Jonathan V Hays (jhays@jtan.com)
Date: Fri Sep 12 2003 - 12:31:38 GMT-3
You're right. In the Real World, redistributing full BGP tables into
your organization's edge routers is probably not wise.
However, it *is* a legitimate and common solution to CCIE Lab scenarios.
The scenario restrictions may not leave you any other choice.
Jonathan
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
MADMAN
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 11:09 AM
To: Kaiser Anwar
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: alternative bgp no sync command
redistribute BGP into your IGP. Ya right. That is why no sync is now
default.
Dave
Kaiser Anwar wrote:
> Hi Group,
> I have a question about no sync command for bgp.I was
doing a lab
> with three routers running IBGP. I did not have the No sync command.
> what would be the alternative to No sync for bgp. Thanks
>
>
> Kaiser A
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Oct 01 2003 - 07:24:27 GMT-3