From: Jennings, Mike (Mike.Jennings@agedwards.com)
Date: Wed Sep 17 2003 - 09:32:33 GMT-3
Looks like it was buggy. I took out a rate-limit that specified
permit UDP any any 'port #'
and UDP traffic not using this port# started working again. It looks like
the router wasn't paying attention to the port#.
There's nothing like a good bug to give fodder to the "routers can't do QoS"
naysayers!
-----Original Message-----
From: Jennings, Mike
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 2:06 PM
To: 'R&S Groupstudy'; Jennings, Mike
Subject: RE: traffic control without congestion
No, it's not that I don't understand it. It's that it doesn't seem to be
working. Maybe I have some buggy code.
- acl's being hit but the rate statements not showing traffic
- seems like traffic being limited by other groups
- drill down processing ... make a change? take it all out, redo, put all
back in
I CAN'T WAIT TO UPGRADE THE CODE SO I CAN DO POLICING WITH POLICIES/CLASSES!
-----Original Message-----
From: R&S Groupstudy [mailto:rsg@synergy-networking.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 10:29 AM
To: 'Jennings, Mike'
Subject: RE: traffic control without congestion
you'll get used to it!
it's just a match and action thing, match "profile" then "drop/forward" etc
> ----------
> From: Jennings, Mike[SMTP:Mike.Jennings@AGEDWARDS.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 4:16 PM
> To: 'R&S Groupstudy'; 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: RE: traffic control without congestion
>
> I'm doing rate-limiting right now and it's nasty.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: R&S Groupstudy [ mailto:rsg@synergy-networking.co.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 10:06 AM
> To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'; Jennings, Mike
> Subject: RE: traffic control without congestion
>
>
> err..
>
> If it's only IP you're looking at then rate limiting is another great
> option..
>
> Adam
> > ----------
> > From: Jennings, Mike[SMTP:Mike.Jennings@agedwards.com]
> > Reply To: Jennings, Mike
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 3:40 PM
> > To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> > Subject: traffic control without congestion
> >
> > It only seems logical that the only option for controlling traffic on a
> > non-congested link would be Policing.
> >
> > Correct?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > ----------------
> > A.G. Edwards & Sons' outgoing and incoming e-mails are electronically
> > archived and subject to review and/or disclosure to someone other
> > than the recipient.
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > ----------------
> >
> > ***Get your CCIE and a FREE vacation: Shop.GroupStudy.com***
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> > shop.groupstudy.com
> >
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
***Get your CCIE and a FREE vacation: Shop.GroupStudy.com***
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Oct 01 2003 - 07:24:29 GMT-3