From: navaid@rogers.com
Date: Thu Sep 25 2003 - 23:24:45 GMT-3
I have seen that with RR if one RR-Client is originating a network the other RR-Client will not get the next-hop address of RR. But if same client is sending an EBGP lean route you will see that RR is modifying next hop correctly.
I think a route-map should work to set the next hop.
Naviad
>
> From: "Kaiser Anwar" <kaiseranwar@sbcglobal.net>
> Date: 2003/09/25 Thu PM 09:08:52 EDT
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Subject: How to change next hop on route reflector.
>
> Hi,
> I am asking the same questions again. I cant seem to catch it. again I have
> three routers.
> R1 is RR client I have switch in the middle which is acting as RR and and
> then R2 is also RR client.
> at this point this I have sessions established.
> Now if I advertise any address lets say 192.168.10.0 also 192.168.10.0 is
> also in my IGP which is ospf.
> r1 gets the route but his next hop is the switch but r2. I try to change
> the next on switch for r1. but it does not take it.
> keep in mind that switch is a route reflector. so summary is r2 it shows as
> a best route and on switch it shows as best
> but not on r1 because of next hop issue. which does not work even after
> putting the next hop command.
>
>
> R2 Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
> *> 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.0 0 32768 I
>
> ***Get your CCIE and a FREE vacation: Shop.GroupStudy.com***
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
1
***Get your CCIE and a FREE vacation: Shop.GroupStudy.com***
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Oct 01 2003 - 07:24:37 GMT-3