From: Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com
Date: Tue Sep 30 2003 - 14:54:25 GMT-3
Blanco,
I went over this with a friend and I now understand it completely. Also,
thanks for forcing me to think by not just giving me the answer.
Thanks to Cabeza also.
Danny
-----Original Message-----
From: Blanco Lam [mailto:b@gclamb.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 11:46 AM
To: Andaluz, Danilo, Triaton/NA
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: EIGRP variance configs
Danny,
Just to give you a little hint - try the following under R7:
router eigrp 100
offset-list 45 out 25600 FastEthernet0
Does variance work?
router eigrp 100
offset-list 45 out 25599 FastEthernet0
And now?
How does EIGRP prevent routing loops?
---- Original message ----
>Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 11:34:14 -0400
>From: <Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com>
>Subject: RE: EIGRP variance configs
>To: b@gclamb.com
>Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>
> I think I saw something in that paragraph and it pretty much has my
> head spinning right now. I'm runningg some tests right now and I will
> let you know what I find. I appreciate the time.
>
> Thanks,
> Danny
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Blanco Lam [mailto:b@gclamb.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 10:33 AM
> To: Andaluz, Danilo, Triaton/NA
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: EIGRP variance configs
>
> Danny,
>
> Let me give you the other half of the story... :)
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1828/products_configuratio
n_gu
> ide_chapter09186a00800ca56b.html#4685
>
> (watch the wrap)
>
> It talks about IGRP but it applies to EIGRP as well. Read the entire
> paragraph
> and see whether you click.
>
> ---- Original message ----
> >Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:58:16 -0400
> >From: <Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com>
> >Subject: RE: EIGRP variance configs
> >To: b@gclamb.com
> >Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >
> > Blanco,
> >
> > According to the following link:
> >
> >
>
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/tk207/technologies_tech_note09186a0080
0943
> 7d.shtml
> >
> > I think I have interpreted the rules correctly. Like this example
> > says, if you have a metric of 20 for one route via one path and a
> > metric of 40 for another path to the same destination and you
> > configure a variance of 2 under EIGRP, traffic to this destination
> > should be load balanced. Unless there is some type of cutoff or
> > something, this should work regardless of the size of the numbers.
> > Let me know what you think.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Danny
***Get your CCIE and a FREE vacation: Shop.GroupStudy.com***
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Oct 01 2003 - 07:24:40 GMT-3