From: yu chunyan (yuchunyan@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Oct 11 2003 - 18:20:36 GMT-3
I donot think so. at least, when we configure bandwidth for classes, we
donot include bandwidth for l2 header, which would need some bandwidth.
Bin.
>From: "Chris Larson" <clarson52@comcast.net>
>Reply-To: "Chris Larson" <clarson52@comcast.net>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Class Default
>Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 13:38:50 -0400
>
> If we are asked to configure multiple classes for CBWFQ and a class for
>all
>other traffic ( a default) then wouldn't it be the case that we should make
>max reserved bandwidth 0
>
>Any traffic that does not confirm to the defined classes would go into the
>configure default class and therefore I think you would not want to keep
>any
>reserved bandwidth on the interface.
>
>It would all go towards the policy that has the configured default class?
>
>Is that correct?
>
>***Get your CCIE and a FREE vacation: Shop.GroupStudy.com***
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>shop.groupstudy.com
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Nov 24 2003 - 07:53:00 GMT-3