Confused about redistribution

From: Stuart Reabow (stuartbr@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Oct 13 2003 - 15:08:06 GMT-3

• Next message: Alsontra Daniels: "Merging vlan access-list with port based access-lists?"
• Previous message: boby2kusa@hotmail.com: "Re: rescore policy"
• Next in thread: kasturi cisco: "Re: Confused about redistribution"
• Maybe reply: kasturi cisco: "Re: Confused about redistribution"
• Maybe reply: Howard C. Berkowitz: "Re: Confused about redistribution"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi all,

I've been working through numerous labs that have multiple routing protocols
per router, sometimes with 1 or 2 proptocols on all the routers. If this is
the case, are we supposed to have all routes in all protocols, or can we
choose one or two protocols to contain all the routes & effectivity ignore
the others? If this gives full connectivity without loops is this wrong?
Also which would be the better one's to use, OSPF, BGP, EIGRP etc....

thanks

Stuart

***Get your CCIE and a FREE vacation: Shop.GroupStudy.com***

• Next message: Alsontra Daniels: "Merging vlan access-list with port based access-lists?"
• Previous message: boby2kusa@hotmail.com: "Re: rescore policy"
• Next in thread: kasturi cisco: "Re: Confused about redistribution"
• Maybe reply: kasturi cisco: "Re: Confused about redistribution"
• Maybe reply: Howard C. Berkowitz: "Re: Confused about redistribution"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Nov 24 2003 - 07:53:01 GMT-3