From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Sat Nov 15 2003 - 21:52:04 GMT-3
Michael,
        As a side note, setting IP precedence on a local POTS peer is no
longer supported.  However you can still set it using the appropriate
DSCP -> IP Prec mappings.  Since DSCP implicitly overlaps IP precedence,
DSCP is the preferred way to color traffic.
Router(config-dial-peer)#ip prec?               
% Unrecognized command
Router(config-dial-peer)#ip qos dscp ?
  <0-63>   DSCP value
  af11     Sets DSCP to assured forwarding (af11) bit pattern 001010
  af12     Sets DSCP to assured forwarding (af12) bit pattern 001100
  af13     Sets DSCP to assured forwarding (af13) bit pattern 001110
  af21     Sets DSCP to assured forwarding (af21) bit pattern 010010
  af22     Sets DSCP to assured forwarding (af22) bit pattern 010100
  af23     Sets DSCP to assured forwarding (af23) bit pattern 010110
  af31     Sets DSCP to assured forwarding (af31) bit pattern 011010
  af32     Sets DSCP to assured forwarding (af32) bit pattern 011100
  af33     Sets DSCP to assured forwarding (af33) bit pattern 011110
  af41     Sets DSCP to assured forwarding (af41) bit pattern 100010
  af42     Sets DSCP to assured forwarding (af42) bit pattern 100100
  af43     Sets DSCP to assured forwarding (af43) bit pattern 100110
  cs1      Sets DSCP to class selector codepoint 1 (precedence 1)
  cs2      Sets DSCP to class selector codepoint 2 (precedence 2)
  cs3      Sets DSCP to class selector codepoint 3 (precedence 3)
  cs4      Sets DSCP to class selector codepoint 4 (precedence 4)
  cs5      Sets DSCP to class selector codepoint 5 (precedence 5)
  cs6      Sets DSCP to class selector codepoint 6 (precedence 6)
  cs7      Sets DSCP to class selector codepoint 7 (precedence 7)
  default  Sets DSCP to default bit pattern of 000000
  ef       Sets DSCP to expedited forwarding bit pattern 101110
HTH,
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com 
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Direct: 708-362-1418 (Outside the US and Canada)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> Michael Snyder
> Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 9:14 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Cc: 'Donny MATEO'
> Subject: RE: Does Precedence 5 always equal DCSP CS5?
> 
> Hold on,
> 
> DCSP CS5 doesn't equal DCSP EF
> 
> Assuming the TOS bits are zero,  Precedence 5 should equal DCSP 40.
> 
> Using TOS, maybe you could get to EF(46).
> 
> I've never played with the TOS bits.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Donny MATEO [mailto:donny.mateo@sg.ca-indosuez.com]
> Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 10:34 AM
> To: Michael Snyder
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com; nobody@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Does Precedence 5 always equal DCSP CS5?
> 
> I seem to remember that DSCP is has another 3 bits addition to the ip
> precedence bits.
> Those 3 bits are the factor determining the drop
preference....(actually
> 
> only 2 is used if I recall correctly). So yeah precedence 5 (EF), but
> what
> kind of drop characteristic ?...... I'm not sure if the implementation
> on
> IOS QOS coding actually take heed of those extra bits in DSCP, but who
> knows.
> 
> Donny
> 
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 12 2003 - 12:29:12 GMT-3