From: k c (jwongccie@yahoo.com.hk)
Date: Wed Nov 19 2003 - 02:47:53 GMT-3
Do u think network 10.10.10.1 0.0.0.0 more safe? Does Cisco encourage people to use it?
Donny MATEO <donny.mateo@sg.ca-indosuez.com> wrote:Do a show ip eigrp interface and you should know your answer.
Passive interface is a command to make an interface passive (meaning not
sending any eigrp advertisement). If memory serves me right, it does not
influence whether an interface would be an eigrp interface or not. If the
interface is listed under the network command and you use passive on that
interface. That interface would still be regarded as an eigrp interface
with no neighbor.
From pass experience, the exact network statement should suffice, however
should you decide to play it safe, it never hurts to put toy around with
passive-interface.
Example,
int e0/0
desc --== EIGRP interface ==--
ip addr 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
!
router ei 1
passive-interface default
no passive-interface e0/0
network 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255
end
Donny
Peng Zheng
Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
11/19/2003 10:46 AM
Please respond to Peng Zheng
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
cc: (bcc: Donny MATEO/ADPC/ASIA/BANQUE_INDOSUEZ/FR)
Subject: passive-interface default
UNder EIGRP, when asked only advertise on specical
interface, for example, interface ethernet 0 address
10.10.10.1/24
Is net 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 enough?
Do I still need to configure
passive-interface default
no passive-interface ethernet 0
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 12 2003 - 12:29:14 GMT-3