From: Church, Chuck (cchurch@wamnetgov.com)
Date: Mon Dec 01 2003 - 13:23:21 GMT-3
I'd lean towards keeping it simple, but it's really only a question the proctor can answer.
Chuck Church
CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
Wam!Net Government Services
13665 Dulles Technology Dr. Ste 250
Herndon, VA 20171
Office: 703-480-2569
Cell: 703-819-3495
cchurch@wamnetgov.com
PGP key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=index&search=cchurch%40wamnetgov.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Driessens.Hans [mailto:hans.driessens@siemens.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 10:36 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: access-lists for routing proto's
> 
> 
> Hi group
> 
> If a question at the lab is someting like 
> 
> "make an ingress filter on ethernet from r1 that only allows 
> http to server
> 1.2.3.4 and make sure that routing isn't affected"
> 
> 
> r1, r2 and r3 are connected to that ethernet segment and are 
> speaking OSPF.
> All the ospf prio's area the same, the ip addresses area 1.1.1.x
> (x=routernumber). Router 1 and 2 are also doing bgp...
> 
> One solution could be 
> 
> router r1
> int e0
>  ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
>  ip access-group FW_E0_IN in
> !
> ip acess-list extended FW_E0_IN
>  permit tcp any host 1.2.3.4 eq 80
>  permit ospf any any
>  permit tcp host 1.1.1.2 host 1.1.1.1 eq bgp 
>  permit tcp host 1.1.1.2 eq bgp host 1.1.1.1 
> !
> 
> 
> another solution could be
> 
> router r1
> int e0
>  ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
>  ip access-group FW_E0_IN in
> !
> ip acess-list extended FW_E0_IN
>  permit tcp any host 1.2.3.4 eq 80
>  permit ospf host 1.1.1.2 host 1.1.1.1
>  permit ospf host 1.1.1.2 host 224.0.0.5
>  permit ospf host 1.1.1.2 host 224.0.0.6
>  permit ospf host 1.1.1.3 host 1.1.1.1
>  permit ospf host 1.1.1.3 host 224.0.0.5
>  permit ospf host 1.1.1.3 host 224.0.0.6
>  permit tcp host 1.1.1.2 gt 1023 host 1.1.1.1 eq bgp 
>  permit tcp host 1.1.1.2 eq bgp host 1.1.1.1 gt 1023
> !
> 
> 
> The second solution is easier to mess up.... but is also more 
> accurate and
> the only correct answer in my opinion. Does anybody know 
> what's considered
> true at the lab. Can there be a difference in the R/S lab versus the
> security lab.
> 
> Hans Driessens
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> _________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study 
> materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
> 
> Subscription information may be found at: 
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jan 03 2004 - 08:25:34 GMT-3