switchport security or mac access-list??

From: Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com
Date: Tue Dec 02 2003 - 20:57:07 GMT-3

• Next message: Brian McGahan: "RE: The bgp confederation peers as-number [... as-number]"
• Previous message: Stuart Reabow: "RE: press enter before the screen displays when connecting to"
• Next in thread: Tony Schaffran: "RE: switchport security or mac access-list??"
• Maybe reply: Tony Schaffran: "RE: switchport security or mac access-list??"
• Maybe reply: David Hiers: "RE: switchport security or mac access-list??"
• Maybe reply: Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com: "RE: switchport security or mac access-list??"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hey, Group. If a requirement states to only allow mac-address
1111.1111.1111 on port f0/15, would it be ok to configure a mac access-list
only allowing this mac or would switchport security with the mac address be
the way to go? They both satisfy the requirement. Not sure on this one.
 
Thanks,
Danny

• Next message: Brian McGahan: "RE: The bgp confederation peers as-number [... as-number]"
• Previous message: Stuart Reabow: "RE: press enter before the screen displays when connecting to"
• Next in thread: Tony Schaffran: "RE: switchport security or mac access-list??"
• Maybe reply: Tony Schaffran: "RE: switchport security or mac access-list??"
• Maybe reply: David Hiers: "RE: switchport security or mac access-list??"
• Maybe reply: Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com: "RE: switchport security or mac access-list??"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jan 03 2004 - 08:25:34 GMT-3