From: Jung, Jin (jin.jung@lmco.com)
Date: Wed Dec 17 2003 - 10:33:30 GMT-3
First, you should not get same AD same metric from different routing
protocol, unless you change the default and make it so, which could be a lot
of work,,
OSPF uses different AD and different metric calculation verses EIGRP.
For you question in regards to EIGRP in different AS.
Look up "variance" command.
By default its 1,
You can change that with above command,,and you will get load balancing.
> Jin Jung CCIE#12368
> Network Infrastructure Engineer
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
William Chen
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 2:18 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Routes learnt by routing protocols with same AD/metric
Dear all,
I think it should be a simple question, but I just never think about it.
If a route is learn from different routing protocol with same AD, and
same metric. What is the preference order? Is there any doc talking about
that?
Look at the following example of a router running EIGRP AS30/EIGRP AS40
and learn same routes. Can I make the router to load balancing the routes?
CAT1#sh ip eigrp top
IP-EIGRP Topology Table for AS(30)/ID(223.1.1.1)
Codes: P - Passive, A - Active, U - Update, Q - Query, R - Reply,
r - reply Status, s - sia Status
P 172.16.200.0/22, 1 successors, FD is 281856
via Summary (281856/0), Null0
P 172.16.201.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 281856
via 172.16.30.20 (281856/25856), Vlan30
P 172.16.202.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 281856
via 172.16.30.20 (281856/25856), Vlan30
P 172.16.203.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 281856
via 172.16.30.20 (281856/25856), Vlan30
P 172.16.30.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 281600
via Connected, Vlan30
P 172.16.120.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 281856
via 172.16.30.20 (281856/25856), Vlan30
P 172.16.110.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 25856
via Rconnected (25856/0)
IP-EIGRP Topology Table for AS(40)/ID(223.1.1.1)
Codes: P - Passive, A - Active, U - Update, Q - Query, R - Reply,
r - reply Status, s - sia Status
P 172.16.201.0/24, 0 successors, FD is Inaccessible
via 172.16.40.20 (281856/25856), Vlan40
P 172.16.202.0/24, 0 successors, FD is Inaccessible
via 172.16.40.20 (281856/25856), Vlan40
P 172.16.203.0/24, 0 successors, FD is Inaccessible
via 172.16.40.20 (281856/25856), Vlan40
P 172.16.40.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 281600
via Connected, Vlan40
P 172.16.120.0/24, 0 successors, FD is Inaccessible
via 172.16.40.20 (281856/25856), Vlan40
P 172.16.110.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 25856
via Rconnected (25856/0)
CAT1#r
Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter
area
* - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR
P - periodic downloaded static route
Gateway of last resort is not set
1.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 1.1.1.0 is directly connected, Loopback84
C 223.1.1.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback83
172.16.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 8 subnets, 2 masks
D 172.16.200.0/22 is a summary, 00:07:22, Null0
D EX 172.16.201.0/24 [170/281856] via 172.16.30.20, 00:07:22, Vlan30
D EX 172.16.202.0/24 [170/281856] via 172.16.30.20, 00:07:22, Vlan30
D EX 172.16.203.0/24 [170/281856] via 172.16.30.20, 00:07:22, Vlan30
C 172.16.40.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan40
C 172.16.30.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan30
D EX 172.16.120.0/24 [170/281856] via 172.16.30.20, 00:07:23, Vlan30
C 172.16.110.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback110
129.1.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 129.1.1.0 is directly connected, Loopback82
126.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 126.1.1.0 is directly connected, Loopback81
Best Regards,
William Chen
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jan 03 2004 - 08:25:42 GMT-3