From: Jeff Colburn (willbccie@yahoo.com)
Date: Wed Dec 17 2003 - 19:36:41 GMT-3
David,
I would recommend treating IS-IS like the other routing protocols. Know it,
Love it, Live it.
Jeff Colburn
#12496
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Porta" <David.Porta003@msd.govt.nz>
To: "gs" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 4:52 PM
Subject: IS-IS: Core subject?
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am hammering away at IS-IS and before I spend too much time on that
> subject, I am curious as to how would you guys categorize IS-IS (without
> breaking the NDA offcourse).
>
> For example, do you think that IS-IS is as relevant to the lab exam as
> DLSW?, or would you say that IS-IS is as relevant to the exam as EIGRP?
>
> I am curious as to how much time people dedicate to this protocol when
> compared to other core subjects like OSPF or BGP.
>
> Thanks in advance.
> _______________________________
> David Porta
> Network Operations
> Ministry of Social Development
>
>
>
> -------------------------------
> This email message and any attachment(s) is intended only for the
> person(s) or entity(entities) to whom it is addressed. The
> information it contains may be classified as IN CONFIDENCE and may be
> legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient any use,
> disclosure or copying of the message or attachment(s) is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this message in error please
> notify us immediately and destroy it and any attachment(s).
> Thank you. The Ministry of Social Development accepts no
> responsibility for changes made to this message or to any
> attachment(s) after transmission from the Ministry.
> -------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jan 03 2004 - 08:25:42 GMT-3