From: William Chen (kwchen@netvigator.com)
Date: Sat Jan 17 2004 - 22:58:10 GMT-3
I will choose to use 1. Becuaes you want to avoid DLSW traffic "goes up" the
ISDN link, you should exclude DLSW traffic from interesting packets. What 2
does for you is prevent DLSW traffic to flap the ISDN link when there is not
user DLSW traffic? Think about there is a real circuit try to set up across
the DLSW, will 2 or 1 avoid DLSW traffic "goes up" the ISDN link?
Best Regards,
William Chen
----- Original Message -----
From: <jfaure@sztele.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 1:44 AM
Subject: DLSW & Dial Backup
> Hi Folks.
>
> Imagine you have a router in a site that normally goes to backbone through
> Frame Relay, but you also have a DDR isdn link to access if the frame
> service is out of service. Your local router is doing dlsw tcp based with
a
> remote router too.
>
> If they ask to configure the dial backup solution to avoid that DLSW
> traffic "goes up" the isdn link, what do you think is the best solution,
> and why:
>
> 1-A dialer-group list denying dlsw as interesting traffic
> 2- To use the option KEEPALIVE 0 in "dlsw remote-peer" command
>
> Thank you very much for your help.
>
> Regards
>
>
> Juan Faure Ferrer
> email: jfaure@sztele.com
>
> Lmnea de Negocio de Telematica y CC
> Ingeniero de Integracisn de Redes y Sistemas
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- > > SOLUZIONA TELECOMUNICACIONES > Servicios Profesionales de UNION FENOSA > Jerez, 3 > 28016 MADRID > tel 91 579 30 00 fax 91 350 72 83 > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- - > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from: > http://shop.groupstudy.com > > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Feb 02 2004 - 09:07:47 GMT-3