From: Sally Crawford (crawford0982003@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Mar 18 2004 - 05:21:17 GMT-3
Thank you Richard & Marvin
I think this problem was fixed in 12.1( 3 ). Check out this link
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/tk480/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094707.shtml
Best Regards
Sally
Richard Dumoulin <richard.dumoulin@vanco.es> wrote:
Hi Sally, with OSPF I think that If you advertise networks by both "network" and "redistribute connected" you'll have the same network in different lsa's, external and router,
Regards
--Richard
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Sally Crawford [mailto:crawford0982003@yahoo.com]
Enviado el: jueves, 18 de marzo de 2004 0:27
Para: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Asunto: Redistribute connected route-map ?
Hi Team
When redistributing connected routes, do we have to create a route-map to specify which connected interfaces are to be redistributed if the interface is already been redistributed by another routing protocol ? Im confused, some LABs im doing are inconsistent with its use of the route-map command. Further , are there any issues that could arise by redistributing interfaces via connected ( without route-map ) and the same interface via a routing protocol. Or am I totally wrong and it depends on the routing protocol. that I am redistributing the connected route into ?
Thanks All
Sally
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Apr 01 2004 - 08:15:33 GMT-3