RE: Bgp summary

From: Snow, Tim (timothy.snow@eds.com)
Date: Sun Mar 21 2004 - 22:05:40 GMT-3

• Next message: Packet Man: "RE: ELMI subject will not be in R/S lab ?"
• Previous message: Narayan Gawas: "rsvp"
• Maybe in reply to: Narayan Gawas: "Bgp summary"
• Next in thread: Packet Man: "RE: Bgp summary"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Where is this scenario coming from? I'm having a hard time understand what
you are asking so I like to take a look at the vendor lab that requests such
a setup.

Thanks.

Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Narayan Gawas
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2004 7:18 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Bgp summary

Is there another way to annonce only a summary address (192.68.0.0 )
from BGP table without using the smmary neither the summary filter ,
summary-only ?

AS ----- R1 ------ R2
R1 BGP Table after aggregate
*> 192.68.0.0/16
*> 192.68.1.0
*> 192.68.2.0
R2 BGP Table which is goal to this senario.
*> 192.68.0.0
R1'router must advertise by 192.68.0.0 except /16'mark
Don't see "/16" word in R2 and it must see "192.68.0.0" only. Don't see "S"
suppress mark in R1. Don't use summary-only command by R1.

• Next message: Packet Man: "RE: ELMI subject will not be in R/S lab ?"
• Previous message: Narayan Gawas: "rsvp"
• Maybe in reply to: Narayan Gawas: "Bgp summary"
• Next in thread: Packet Man: "RE: Bgp summary"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Apr 01 2004 - 08:15:43 GMT-3