From: Stephen Skinner (stephen_ski@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon May 03 2004 - 11:05:03 GMT-3
Thanks for the confirmation ,
as to the new problem ...hmmm..
s hint i think would be in order
cheers
>From: "Kenneth Wygand" <KWygand@customonline.com>
>Reply-To: "Kenneth Wygand" <KWygand@customonline.com>
>To: "Kian Wah, Lai" <kian_wah@qala.com.sg>,   "Stephen Skinner"  
><stephen_ski@hotmail.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: RE: Lab workbook Preferred route (Quiz #4 too!)
>Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 12:27:21 -0400
>
>That's a third way I didn't even consider... :)
>
>	-----Original Message-----
>	From: Kian Wah, Lai [mailto:kian_wah@qala.com.sg]
>	Sent: Sun 5/2/2004 12:22 PM
>	To: Kenneth Wygand; 'Stephen Skinner'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>	Cc:
>	Subject: RE: Lab workbook Preferred route (Quiz #4 too!)
>
>
>
>	Hi,
>
>	AS Path?
>
>	Router A:
>	Route-map
>	Match ip add <ip of F>
>	Set as-path prepend x
>
>	Then apply to a neighbor. Can this work?
>
>	Regards,
>	Kian Wah, Lai
>
>	-----Original Message-----
>	From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>	Kenneth Wygand
>	Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2004 11:41 PM
>	To: Stephen Skinner; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>	Subject: RE: Lab workbook Preferred route (Quiz #4 too!)
>
>	Steve,
>
>	Your "pseudo-commands" are correct.  Keep in mind these "set metric"
>	commands must be tied to your external BGP sessions through "route-map"
>	attributes on your "neighbor" statements.  This will inherently provide
>	redundancy because MED is a preferential variable.  It will _prefer_ one
>	route over the other, but will fall back to the route with the higher MED 
>if
>	the route with the lower MED is unavailable.  The reason this is stated in
>	the practice lab question is so that you don't _filter_ out the
>	lesser-preferred route, leaving only the preferred route in the BGP table.
>
>	Your answer is correct.  However, take a spin off of this question.  
>Imagine
>	the scenario also stated "You can only use a single "set metric" statement
>	within the route-map tied to each external neighbor".
>
>	This is one of those pitfalls the lab can easily throw you into.  I can
>	immediately think of at least two ways this can be accomplished, one of
>	which is unconventional.  However, this is the thinking you need to pass 
>the
>	lab!!
>
>	If I don't receive the correct answer soon, I'll email it out.  Or maybe
>	I'll give a hint.  For now, see whose BGP skills are sharp and write back!
>	:)
>
>	Good luck!
>	Ken
>
>	        -----Original Message-----
>	        From: nobody@groupstudy.com on behalf of Stephen Skinner
>	        Sent: Sun 5/2/2004 9:18 AM
>	        To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>	        Cc:
>	        Subject: Lab workbook Preferred route
>
>
>
>	        Guys,
>
>	        have another question ,
>
>	        again i am trying to understand what the question is asking 
>..aswell
>	as how
>	        to do it....
>
>
>	        i ahve learnt that question interpretation is 80% of the lab....if 
>i
>	don`t
>	        know what you are asking i don`t know what to do !!!!
>
>	        i have two routers ..router A and B ,they have external BGP peers
>	router
>	        BGP1(router a) and BGP (Router b)
>
>	        these two router`s connect over FR to Router F point to multi
>
>	        bgp I betwen A,B ,F
>	        bgp E between A, BGP1 and B,BGP2
>
>	        i want to manipulate my external peers ( ie advertise out)
>
>	        the question is ....
>
>	        make Router B the preferred entry point to get to Router F
>	        make router A the prefered entry point to get to router A
>
>	        make sure there is redundency for bo th routes
>
>	        now i think that MED will do this on router B to get to F and MED 
>on
>	router
>	        A to get to itself
>
>	        but how about the redundency ...
>	        simply med again ...
>
>	        i.e router B
>	        med 50 router F
>	        med 100 router A
>
>	        router A
>	        med 100 router F
>	        med 50 router A
>
>	        is this right ???
>
>	        any help / config`s would be great
>
>	        many thanks
>
>	        steve
>
>	        _________________________________________________________________
>	        Tired of 56k? Get a FREE BT Broadband connection
>	        http://www.msn.co.uk/specials/btbroadband
>
>
>	_______________________________________________________________________
>	        Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials
>	from:
>	        http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
>	        Subscription information may be found at:
>	        http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>	_______________________________________________________________________
>	Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>	http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
>	Subscription information may be found at:
>	http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jun 02 2004 - 11:12:03 GMT-3