From: David Hiers (David_Hiers@adp.com)
Date: Wed May 19 2004 - 13:53:58 GMT-3
Don't count on it. Know how to work it out in binary from the definitions.
David
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Yash Bajpai
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 8:40 AM
To: Kenneth Wygand; Ahmed Mustafa; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: IP Precedence Vs DSCP
Please pray tell me that we would be given a QOS map
table to find out appropriate DSCP values.
(yes..yes..yes?)
--- Kenneth Wygand <KWygand@customonline.com> wrote:
> Ahmed,
>
> They are both perfect answers given your
> requirements. Any DSCP value between 40-47 are
> considered IP Precedence 5 when using IP Precedence
> classification. If this were the actual exam, I
> would ask the proctor if I was to set any value for
> the drop-bits in the DSCP value. Or another way of
> asking it is if they entire TOS byte must be
> identical when using DSCP as when using IP
> Precedence 5. The answers to these questions will
> indicate which one will satisfy the given
> requirements.
>
> HTH,
> Ken
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com on behalf of Ahmed
> Mustafa
> Sent: Wed 5/19/2004 1:32 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Cc:
> Subject: IP Precedence Vs DSCP
>
>
>
> If the task states use the DSCP value equivalent to
> IP Precedence 5.
>
>
> per DQOS book,
>
>
> IP precedence values
>
> 000 0
> 001 CS1
> 010 CS2
> 011 CS3
> 100 CS4
> 101 CS5
> 110 CS6
> 111 CS7
>
> So would I chose CS7 or EF?
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jun 02 2004 - 11:12:13 GMT-3