From: MMoniz (ccie2002@tampabay.rr.com)
Date: Sat May 22 2004 - 13:50:02 GMT-3
I am not sure what you are really asking. An E.164 telephone number is a
complete ITU standards number.
Where did you get the info that a "+" before the destination pattern means
it is a E.164 number? I've not
heard that before. 1(408)4061212 is a complete ITU standards E.164 number.
Please let me know where you got that info. Maybe I am missing something.
Here are a couple of useful links.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fvvf
ax_c/vvfpeers.htm#28436
http://www.numberingplans.com/index.php?goto=guide&topic=E164
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
ccie2be
Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 12:10 PM
To: Group Study
Subject: E.164 numbers
Hi all,
If told, when configuring voip dial-peers, to configure a number as an
E.164,
I know that means to put a "+" in front of the number. But, if a plus sign
in
front of a number means it's an E.164 number, what kind of a number is it
without the plus sign in front?
Also, is there a way the task could be phrased such that an E.164 number is
required to correctly complete the task even though the task didn't
explicitly
state to use an E.164 number?
TIA
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jun 02 2004 - 11:12:15 GMT-3