From: Howard C. Berkowitz (hcb@gettcomm.com)
Date: Mon May 24 2004 - 13:07:37 GMT-3
At 10:55 AM +0530 5/24/04, Mohamed wrote:
>1- I don't think it should be avoided-we have lot of options to tune the
>updates
>
Now, there may be reason to do it in a CCIE lab, simply because the
exam says so.
In practice, however, I don't see much of reason beside traffic
engineering to do so in the real world. There are often better
solutions for traffic engineering.
I'm puzzled why one would go through the bother of extensive tuning
of updates, risking a collapse of the LSDB if the updates are not
properly tuned at all times. What does the redistribution get for
you, especially since the great majority of Internet routing policies
are closest-exit, also called hot potato?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>Ahmed Mustafa
>Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 10:23 AM
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: BGP and Confederation
>
>
>1) Is it true that redistributing bgp into ospf should be avoided as
>much as possible.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jun 02 2004 - 11:12:16 GMT-3