From: Peter van Oene (pvo@usermail.com)
Date: Thu Jun 10 2004 - 09:18:09 GMT-3
At 03:01 PM 6/8/2004, Jay Chandradas wrote:
>Cool.. That's great Scott. How do you find the JNCIE in terms of the
>depth of extertise or compared to the level of expertise cisco does
>for CCIE- R& S. Is there a lot of Juniper specific stuffs they wanted
>us to know or is it the Technology as a such ? Or is there an overlap.
>Just curious.
For what it's worth, the Juniper exam is very best practices oriented. In
that way, there are no Juniper centric nuances tested, nor protocol nuances
that would not be reflective of good network design. Essentially, if you
understand the protocols, and ISP design concepts (multi-service ones as
well), you should be able to pass the test. Of course, there is a lot of
material in a short period of time, and many design constraints that can
trip you up if you don't design with the whole in mind ;-) Quick typing
and/or use of notepad and config templates really help.
>-Jay
>
>Jay Chandradas, CCIE #8060 ( R&S , Security )
>jachandr@cisco.com
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>Scott Morris
>Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 11:41 AM
>To: 'Alexander Arsenyev (GU/ETL)'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: ANOTHER ONE GO...#13405
>
>
>Congrats! Especially on the re-read! Glad to hear a success story
>every once and a while with that!
>
>Best of luck on your JNCIE, I'm sure you'll find that to be an
>interesting journey! Challenging in a different manner! I recently did
>the first of the labs (JNCIP) and still have a little way to go. Fun
>boxes all around though!
>
>
>Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
>CISSP, JNCIP, et al. IPExpert CCIE Program Manager IPExpert Sr.
>Technical Instructor swm@emanon.com/smorris@ipexpert.net
>http://www.ipexpert.net
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>Alexander Arsenyev (GU/ETL)
>Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 4:32 AM
>To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
>Subject: ANOTHER ONE GO...#13405
>
>All,
>
>For those who don't know me - a majority - I've been mainly a silent
>listener since Jan 2003 and sometimes a contributor to this wonderful
>group.
>
>Someone can probably recall the "tunnel hack" I posted here several
>weeks ago to overcome the situation when OSPF area needs to be connected
>to the backbone with GRE tunnel but no additional addresses are to be
>used. Don't know if anyone actually used it in the lab :-) I passed
>after a re-read in my second attempt (12 May 2004 in Brussels). It is
>definitely achievable but You have to bear with it - my re-read took 3.5
>weeks, I guess because of non-standard approach I used to solve lab
>tasks. I also felt that this non-standard approach could be counted
>bothways - either add You points or take it - and Cisco seems willing to
>add You points if there is a chance, not other way around. Anyway,
>embarking on my next trip to JNCIE - this one should be at least as
>challenging as this one.
>
>Good luck to anyone going to the CCIE lab and don't give up!
>
> > Thanks and regards,
> >
> > Alex
>#13405 R&S
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 03 2004 - 19:40:36 GMT-3