From: Howard C. Berkowitz (hcb@gettcomm.com)
Date: Sat Jun 26 2004 - 13:20:42 GMT-3
At 10:56 AM -0400 6/26/04, Joe Chang wrote:
>The OSPF RFCs detail an unimplemented TOS feature. I don't think OSPF is the
>way to do it. On certain platforms ATM has a feature to split a flow into
>different VCs based on packet precedence, but I don't think that is
>available for FR.
TOS support was made Historic in RFC 2328.
>
>Your best bet may be PBR, but of course there are performance penalties with
>that approach.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 03 2004 - 19:40:50 GMT-3