From: Yasser Aly (yasser.aly@noorgroup.net)
Date: Sun Jul 11 2004 - 13:18:15 GMT-3
Hi Kenneth,
Thanks for responding. I don't know whether it is allowed to create an
extra dial-peer on the lab or not but Let's say you can do this. This brings
some extra questions like
What will you put in the session-target ?? Is it possible to make a voip
dial-peer without configuring a session-target inside it ??
Also, what would be your approach if it is required to forward any dialed
pattern - other than the 1111 - to voip session target x.x.x.x and when 1111
is dialed to forward the call over the WAN to another non-defined session
target other than the x.x.x.x
Regards,
Yasser
-----Original Message-----
From: Kenneth Wygand [mailto:KWygand@customonline.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2004 6:55 PM
To: Yasser Aly; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Not matching a dial pattern
Yasser,
I'm not sure about this, but you could always match "1111" to a "dead dial
peer" and use '.T' to match everything else. This should work since anytime
the user dials 1111, it will use the longest match, which will be to the
dead peer. However, if there is a way of "not" matching something, I'm sure
that would be a better solution. But nonetheless, this should accomplish
your goal too! :)
Kenneth E. Wygand
Systems Engineer, Project Services
CISSP #37102, CCNP, CCDP, ACSP, Cisco IPT Design Specialist, MCP, CNA,
Network+, A+
Custom Computer Specialists, Inc.
"The only unattainable goal is the one not attempted."
-Anonymous
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Yasser Aly
Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2004 11:43 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Not matching a dial pattern
Hello All,
I wonder if it is possible to create a destination pattern in the meaning
of " Don't match this pattern ". For example if you want to create a voip
dial-peer that match on every destination - you would use the .T - but at
the same time does not match 1111. Can this be done ?,
Regards,
Yasser
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:11:52 GMT-3