From: Lord, Chris (chris.lord@lorien.co.uk)
Date: Fri Jul 16 2004 - 12:38:33 GMT-3
I have come across several sample scenarios where, say, Rx is connected to a backbone router and they run eigrp between them. You are then asked not to send eigrp updates from your pod (Rx) to the backbone but you must be able to recieve routes from the bb. Two different solutions seem to be forthcoming:
1) Rx: router eigrp 10
distribute-list 10 out e0/0
access-list 10 deny any
2) Rx: router eigrp 10
eigrp stub receive-only
If we were faced with this in the lab, provided that no other specific information was provided, do you think either solution could be used. Or have I missed some subtle difference between the two approaches?
Cheers,
Chris
**********************************************************************
The information contained in this email is confidential and is intended for the recipient only. If you have received it in error, please notify us immediately by reply email and then delete it from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person or store or copy this information in any medium. The views contained in this email are those of the author and not necessarily those of Lorien plc.
Thank you for your co-operation.
**********************************************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:11:57 GMT-3