From: Lord, Chris (chris.lord@lorien.co.uk)
Date: Sat Jul 17 2004 - 18:03:22 GMT-3
Please could I ask for some opinions.......
A lot of practice lab scenarios state standard assumptions such as "do not use static or default routes on any router, etc" and "full connectivity must be attained, etc". Suppose we met this in the real lab, my question is this... if one of the switches has a vlan interface with an ip address assigned to it then I assume the pod should be able to ping it and vica-versa. If the switch is not running an IGP, is the use of "ip default-gateway" permissible or does this break the rules?
If you can't use "ip default-gateway" do you think configuring irdp on the attached router in the switch's management vlan would be a good alternative?
thx in anticipation,
Chris.
**********************************************************************
The information contained in this email is confidential and is intended for the recipient only. If you have received it in error, please notify us immediately by reply email and then delete it from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person or store or copy this information in any medium. The views contained in this email are those of the author and not necessarily those of Lorien plc.
Thank you for your co-operation.
**********************************************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:11:57 GMT-3