From: Bob Sinclair (bsin@cox.net)
Date: Fri Jul 23 2004 - 23:12:50 GMT-3
Dehong,
If you are required to have differet interfaces on the same router in
different ISIS areas, then I would suggest two different ISIS processes.
This is the approach suggested by Cisco in the link below. When you
configure multiple NETs under one process, your database will show a single,
merged area.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/120newft/120t/120t5/ismarea.htm
Bob Sinclair
CCIE #10427, CISSP, MCSE
www.netmasterclass.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wang Dehong-DWANG1" <Dehong.Wang@motorola.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 4:37 PM
Subject: ISIS mutiple area question..
> I have another question for the group. If you are asked to configure
multiple areas, say 2, under one router, should you configure two net
statements under one router isis or two seperate net statements under
different router isis? or it doesn't matter? My thought is two router isis
statements, but I did see case 1 as well, so I would like to clarify it with
the group..
>
> Case 1:
>
> router isis
> net 49.area-A.xxxx.xxxx.xxxx.00
> net 49.area-B.xxxx.xxxx.xxxx.00
>
> Case 2:
> router isis
> net 49.area-A.xxxx.xxxx.xxxx.00
>
> router isis area-b
> net 49.area-B.xxxx.xxxx.xxxx.00
>
> thanks in advance..
>
> - Dehong
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:12:01 GMT-3